MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050273510 · doi:10.1524/zpch.2012.0295

Generalized Routes to Mesostructured Silicates with High Metal Content

2012· article· en· W2050273510 on OpenAlexaff
Scott C. Warren, Matthew R. Perkins, Ulrike Werner‐Zwanziger, Josef W. Zwanziger, Franics J. DiSalvo, Ulrich Wiesner

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCornell Center for Materials ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSmall-angle X-ray scatteringLigand (biochemistry)Materials scienceMetalSol-gelNanomaterialsNanocompositeChemical engineeringTransmission electron microscopySilaneScatteringNanotechnologyChemistryComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nanostructured materials with high metal content are interesting for a number of applications, including catalysis as well as energy conversion and storage. Here we elaborate an approach that combines the advantages of simple silica sol-gel chemistry with the ability to tailor metal composition and structure by introducing a ligand that connects a silane with an amino acid or hydroxy acid. Reacting this ligand with a metal acetate generates a precursor for a range of metal-silica nanocomposites. Comparing this chemistry with conventional organic ligand-metal complexes that can be physically mixed into sol-gel derived silicates elucidates advantages, e.g. of going to high metal loadings. Resulting nanomaterials are characterized by a combination of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to reveal structural characteristics on multiple lengths scales, i.e. from the microscopic (molecular) level (NMR) all the way to the mesoscale (SAXS) and macroscale (TEM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Physikalische ChemieSame topicMesoporous Materials and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207