High-Voltage Electrolytes Based on Adiponitrile for Li-Ion Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adiponitrile, , ADN, was evaluated as both a solvent and cosolvent in safer and more electrochemically stable electrolytes suitable for high energy and power density Li-ion batteries. An electrochemical investigation of its electrolyte solution with the , LiTFSI, salt showed a wide electrochemical window of vs . The high melting point and the incompatibility of ADN with graphite anode required the use of ethylene carbonate (EC) as a cosolvent. The resultant EC:ADN electrolyte solutions showed ionic conductivities reaching , viscosities of , and an improved resistance to aluminum corrosion up to , all at . Li-ion batteries incorporating graphite/ electrodes were assembled using EC:ADN electrolyte mixture containing LiTFSI and LiBOB as a cosalt, and discharge capacities of with very good capacity retention were obtained. AC impedance spectra of the batteries recorded as a function of charging and cycling indicated the presence of a stable solid electrolyte interface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".