MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050286498 · doi:10.1086/321508

The Structure of Self‐gravitating Polytropic Systems with<i>n</i>around 5

2001· article· en· W2050286498 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStatistical Mechanics and Entropy
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolytropic processPolytropeNonlinear systemStellar structureStability (learning theory)Duality (order theory)Poisson distribution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the structure of self-gravitating polytropic stellar systems. We present a method that allows us to obtain approximate analytical solutions, ψ n + ( x ) of the nonlinear Poisson equation with the polytropic index n + , given the solution ψ n ( x ) with the polytropic index n , for any positive or negative , such that | | ≪ 1. A similar technique has been developed independently by Seidov & Kuzakhmedov. Application of this method to the spherically symmetric stellar polytropes with n ≃ 5 yields the solutions that describe spatially bound systems, if n < 5, and the formation of a second core, if n > 5. A heuristic approximate expression for the radial profile is also presented. Because of the duality between stellar and gas polytropes, our results are valid for gaseous, self-gravitating, polytropic systems (e.g., molecular clouds) with index γ ≃ 6/5. The stability of such systems and observational consequences for both stellar and gaseous systems are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicStatistical Mechanics and EntropyFrench-language works237,207