MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050321199 · doi:10.1029/2005gl022471

Mixing estimates from a large‐scale hydrographic survey in the North Atlantic

2005· article· en· W2050321199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maren Walter, Christian Mertens, Monika Rhein

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsHydrographyGeologyMid-Atlantic RidgeHydrographic surveyOceanographyBathymetryMixing (physics)RidgeScale (ratio)Boundary currentClimatologyOcean currentGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A large‐scale hydrographic survey from 2003 (RV Meteor cruise M59/2) is used to map turbulent mixing by means of eddy diffusivities from finescale shear and strain in the subpolar North Atlantic, covering various hydrographic and bathymetric conditions. Results from the analysis indicate small (O(10 −5 ) m 2 s −1 ) diffusivities below the Labrador Sea Water layer at mid‐depth in the open ocean. Higher values exceeding 10 −4 m 2 s −1 are found in the abyss close to rough topography and over the flanks of the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge. The strongest mixing with diffusivities of 10 −3 m 2 s −1 occurs in the Deep Western Boundary Current off Flemish Cap. The results of this study convey the need to map mixing globally from existing sets of CTD/LADCP data as well as its feasibility: the similarities and differences in mixing patterns as compared to other studies indicate that large scale patterns of small scale processes are still not well known and understood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207