Bibliographic record
Abstract
La maison rurale canadienne a subi une lente évolution, faite d'échecs et de trouvailles. Les premiers colons, habitués à un climat tempéré, aux hivers relativement doux, n'étaient pas préparés à lutter contre le froid canadien. Les pierres dont étaient faites les maisons étaient de mauvais isolants et subissaient l'action désastreuse du gel et du dégel. Les foyers, les âtres, chauffaient l'air du temps. Cette mésadaptation a fait de nombreux ravages dans la population et chez les animaux. Après maints et parfois vains tâtonnements, lambrissage des murs extérieurs, planchers isolés du sol, avènement du poêle central, constructions en bois recouvertes de bardeaux de cèdre, diversification des bâtiments, la maison rurale canadienne a pris peu à peu un caractère propre qui la distingue de toute autre maison rurale européenne. Cependant, malgré certains traits bien personnels, elle rejoint un type d'habitation installé dans toute l’Amérique du Nord, avec ses balcons, ses galeries extérieures et ses multiples bâtiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".