MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050358874 · doi:10.1021/jp0012247

Many-Body Effects in Systems of Peptide Hydrogen-Bonded Networks and Their Contributions to Ligand Binding:  A Comparison of the Performances of DFT and Polarizable Molecular Mechanics

2000· article· en· W2050358874 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersRégion NormandieCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsSolvationPolarizable continuum modelCooperativityComputational chemistryChemistryDensity functional theoryImplicit solvationMolecular mechanicsAb initioFormateSolvent modelsPolarizabilityBinding energyMoleculeThermodynamicsMolecular dynamicsPhysicsAtomic physicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compute the stabilization energies of the complexes formed between formate or water and a linear array of n = 2−5 N -methylformamide (NMF) molecules. We perform density functional theory (DFT), ab initio SCF and MP2, and SIBFA molecular mechanics computations. A very significant amount of cooperativity is found by DFT in the formate--(NMF) n complexes, amounting to −17 kcal/mol with n = 5. The SIBFA computations with fixed internal geometries for the monomers recover up to 80% of the DFT values. Single-point SCF/MP2 computations at the SIBFA-optimized geometries give binding energies and cooperativities very close to the SIBFA values. Solvation effects as represented by a continuum reaction field procedure are found to affect cooperativity to a modest extent. The implications for oligopeptides are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it