Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article tente d’analyser l’attitude du général de Gaulle vis-à-vis de la francophonie. La première partie se concentre sur les relations bilatérales que la France entretient avec les pays francophones (particulièrement avec l’Afrique noire et l’Algérie). La seconde partie concerne la réserve que de Gaulle manifeste à l’égard de l’institutionnalisation de la francophonie. En effet, de Gaulle ne croit pas à la nécessité de créer des institutions pour faire vivre la francophonie, puisqu’il juge la politique bilatérale comme l’instrument le plus efficace pour établir des liens tout en respectant chacun des États concernés. Finalement, nul ne peut nier qu’en dépit de sa tiédeur et de ses hésitations à l’égard d’une expression politique de la francophonie, de Gaulle fut indirectement l’un des artisans importants de ce mouvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".