MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050375266 · doi:10.1093/pasj/53.6.l51

Discovery of a New ER UMa-Type Dwarf Nova IX Draconis

2001· article· en· W2050375266 on OpenAlexaff
Ryoko Ishioka, Taichi Kato, Makoto Uemura, H. Iwamatsu, Katsura Matsumoto, Brian Martin, G. Billings, Р. Новак

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsThe King's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsDwarf novaStarsLight curveAmplitudeDuty cycleAstronomyWhite dwarfThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We observed a new dwarf nova, IX Dra, for 46 days between 2000 November 10 and 2001 June 17, and revealed that IX Dra is the fifth member of a peculiar group of SU UMa stars, called ER UMa stars. The light curve is almost perfectly identical to that of V1159 Ori: supercycle, 53 d; interval of normal outbursts, 3–4 d; duty cycle, $\sim 30\%$; and the outburst amplitude, 2.5 mag. From a time-series observation during the superoutbursts, we obtained a presumable superhump period of 0.067 d. We note that some clustering may exist in the period distribution of ER UMa stars. It is needed to confirm this clustering by a larger number of examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of JapanSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207