NMR Studies of the Dynamics of a Bifunctional Rhodamine Probe Attached to Troponin C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluorescence polarization measurements of bifunctional rhodamine (BR) probes provide a powerful approach to determine the in situ orientation of proteins within ordered complexes such as muscle fibers. For accurate interpretation of fluorescence measurements, it is important to understand the probe dynamics relative to the protein to which it is attached. We previously determined the structure of the N-domain of chicken skeletal troponin C, BR-labeled on the C helix, in complex with the switch region of troponin I, and demonstrated that the probe does not perturb the structure or dynamics of the protein. In this study, the motion of the fluorescence label relative to the protein has been characterized using NMR relaxation measurements of 13C-labeled methyl groups on the BR probe and 15N-labeled backbone amides of the protein. Probe dynamics were monitored using off-resonance 13C-R(1rho), 13C-R(1) and {1H}-13C NOE at magnetic field strengths of 500, 600, and 800 MHz. Relaxation data were interpreted in terms of the overall rotational correlation time of the protein and a two-time scale model for internal motion of the BR methyl groups, using a numerical optimization with Monte Carlo parameter error estimation. The analysis yields a 1.5 +/- 0.4 ps correlation time for rotation around the three-fold methyl symmetry axis, and a 0.8 +/- 0.4 ns rotational correlation time for reorientation of the 13C-14N bond with an associated S2s of 0.79 +/- 0.03. Order parameters of the backbone NH vectors in the helix to which the probe is attached average S2 approximately 0.85, implying that the amplitude of independent reorientation of the BR probe is small in magnitude, consistent with results from fluorescence polarization measurements in reconstituted muscle fibers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".