MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050384687 · doi:10.1109/tec.2008.921465

Power System Stabilizer Design Using an Online Adaptive Neurofuzzy Controller With Adaptive Input Link Weights

2008· article· en· W2050384687 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Computer scienceElectric power systemPower (physics)Control engineeringAdaptive controlGradient descentStabilizer (aeronautics)EngineeringArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A neurofuzzy controller (NFC) with adaptive input link weights (ILWs) and working as an adaptive power system stabilizer is presented. The control structure of the proposed adaptive neurofuzzy power system stabilizers (ANFPSSs) consists of a neuroidentifier to track the dynamic behavior of the plant and an NFC to damp the low-frequency power system oscillations. Usually, the input membership functions (IMFs) and consequent parameters (CPs) are adapted in order to enhance the performance of the NFC. However, the adjustment of IMFs can be realized indirectly by the tuning of ILWs introduced here, which is simpler due to the small number of parameters involved. Therefore, in this paper, ILWs and CPs are updated online by the gradient descent method. Simulation studies over a range of operating conditions and disturbances in a single machine-infinite bus system and a multimachine power system demonstrate the improvement in the dynamic performance of the system with the proposed ANFPSS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it