Stereochemical Analysis of the Functional Significance of the Conserved Inverted CCAAT and TATA Elements in the Rat Bone Sialoprotein Gene Promoter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Basal transcription of the bone sialoprotein gene is mediated by highly conserved inverted CCAAT (ICE; ATTGG) and TATA elements (TTTATA) separated by precisely 21 nucleotides. Here we studied the importance of the relative position and orientation of the CCAAT and TATA elements in the proximal promoter by measuring the transcriptional activity of a series of mutated reporter constructs in transient transfection assays. Whereas inverting the TTTATA (wild type) to a TATAAA (consensus TATA) sequence increased transcription slightly, transcription was reduced when the flanking dinucleotides were also inverted. In contrast, reversing the ATTGG (wild type; ICE) to a CCAAT (RICE) sequence caused a marked reduction in transcription, whereas both transcription and NF-Y binding were progressively increased with the simultaneous inversion of flanking nucleotides (f-RICE-f). Reducing the distance between the ICE and TATA elements produced cyclical changes in transcriptional activity that correlated with progressive alterations in the relative positions of the CCAAT and TATA elements on the face of the DNA helix. Minimal transcription was observed after 5 nucleotides were deleted (equivalent to approximately one half turn of the helix), whereas transcription was fully restored after deleting 10 nucleotides (approximately one full turn of the DNA helix), transcriptional activity being progressively lost with deletions beyond 10 nucleotides. In comparison, when deletions were made with the ICE in the reversed (f-RICE-f) orientation transcriptional activity was progressively lost with no recovery. These results show that, although transcription can still occur when the CCAAT box is reversed and/or displaced relative to the TATA box, the activity is dependent upon the flexibility of the intervening DNA helix needed to align the NF-Y complex on the CCAAT box with preinitiation complex proteins that bind to the TATA box. Thus, the precise location and orientation of the CCAAT element is necessary for optimizing basal transcription of the bone sialoprotein gene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".