Growth and body composition in children with classical phenylketonuria: Results in 34 patients and review of the literature
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment of phenylketonuria (PKU, OMIM 261600) means a diet restricted in natural protein and supplemented with phenylalanine (Phe)-free L-amino acid mixtures. Growth impairment has been described even in patients with a total protein intake at or above the recommended dietary allowance (RDA). In the present study, growth and body composition (fat-free mass (FFM) and fat) were recorded over 12 months in 34 treated PKU patients (mean age 8.7 years at baseline). Measurements were compared with those of healthy peers and with general population standard (Z-) scores calculated using the LMS method. In 28 PKU patients, data on birth weight and birth length were available and related to measurements at baseline of the study. Mean total protein intake in PKU patients was 124% (range 77-193%) of the RDA (DACH 2000). No significant differences in growth and body composition were present between PKU patients and healthy populations either at birth or during the study period. The significant correlation of FFM (representing muscle mass) with intake of natural protein--rather than total protein--indicates that the enhancement of tolerance to natural protein may be of value in PKU patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it