MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050443623 · doi:10.1080/1362102032000134985

A road runs through it: Aboriginal citizenship at the edge of urban development

2003· article· en· W2050443623 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricia K. Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueCitizenship Studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipPoliticsGeographyTreatyNegotiationIdentity (music)Political scienceImmigrationEconomic growthEconomyLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Tsuu T'ina Nation, a First Nations reserve established following the Treaty 7 in southern Alberta, lies to the immediate southwest of the city of Calgary. Expansion of the city in the post-World War II era has brought residential and commercial development up to the north, east and south boundaries of the Nation. The political and natural geography of the two communities led to proposals beginning in the 1960s to build a commuter road through the reserve to alleviate Calgary's traffic congestion. The local Native/non-Native relationship, despite many points of informal contact between the communities, is limited to negotiations over this road. This long-standing issue reveals much about the local practices of Aboriginal citizenship in the pressure Calgary's development places on the Tsuu T'ina, as well as the opportunities proximity to the city presents for the band. Calgary's position restricts the expression of Tsuu T'ina identity, assertion of land rights, and the band's economic development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0210.017
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCitizenship StudiesSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207