MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050446490 · doi:10.7202/1024256ar

Usage du passé et mémoire collective franco-ontarienne : le souvenir du Règlement 17 dans la bataille pour sauver l’hôpital Montfort

2014· article· fr· W2050446490 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueMens Revue d histoire intellectuelle et culturelle · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C’est en se référant à la lutte contre le Règlement 17 que la présidente du comité S.O.S. Montfort, Gisèle Lalonde, présente la lutte pour sauver l’hôpital Montfort. Cet épisode constitue un cas d’analyse des efforts, déployés par les responsables de S.O.S. Montfort, pour mobiliser la communauté en se référant à l’histoire. C’est aussi l’occasion d’analyser les usages précis de la mémoire collective des Franco-Ontariens dans le but de donner du sens à l’expérience historique de la communauté.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it