MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050453052 · doi:10.1002/pssc.200674291

Bismuth incorporation in GaAs<sub>1–x</sub>Bi<sub>x</sub> grown by molecular beam epitaxy with <i>in‐situ</i> light scattering

2007· article· en· W2050453052 on OpenAlexafffund
Erin C. Young, Michael Brian Whitwick, T. Tiedje, Daniel A. Beaton

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMolecular beam epitaxyBismuthMaterials scienceScatteringSemiconductorBand gapAlloyConduction bandEpitaxyNitrideCondensed matter physicsIn situOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CrystallographyChemistryNanotechnologyOpticsMetallurgyLayer (electronics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The dilute bismide semiconductor GaAs1–xBix is an interesting new semiconductor alloy with novel properties and potential device applications. Like the dilute nitride alloy GaAs1–xNx, the dilute bismide shows a giant bandgap bowing effect. Bi alloying primarily affects the states in the vicinity of the top of the valence band rather than the bottom of the conduction band as in the case of N alloying. MBE growth of dilute bismides requires low growth temperatures (320‐390 °C) and near stochiometric group III/V ratios, due to the strong tendency of Bi to surface segregate under usual GaAs growth conditions. Optimal growth conditions are close to conditions that produce Bi and/or Ga droplets. In‐situ light scattering is found to be a useful tool for defining growth conditions that do not produce droplets on the surface. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physicsSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207