MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050476328 · doi:10.1021/bm0610976

Regioselective Silylation of <i>N</i>-Phthaloylchitosan with TBDMS and TBDPS Groups

2007· article· en· W2050476328 on OpenAlexafffund
Alain Binette, Jonathan Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomacromolecules · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Synthesis and Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRegioselectivitySilylationChemistryImidazoleSolventPyridineStoichiometryOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryPolymer chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

N-Phthaloylchitosan represents a key intermediate for the regioselective modification of chitosan in organic media. Chemoselective protection of primary alcohols on N-phthaloylchitosan was achieved with tert-butyldimethylsilyl (TBDMS) and tert-butyldiphenylsilyl (TBDPS) groups in imidazole/DMF and DMAP/pyridine. Influence of experimental conditions such as solvent, choice of base, stoichiometry, temperature, and time of reaction was studied regarding the degree of substitution (ds) of silyl groups. TBDMS groups allow higher ds than TBDPS groups. Higher reaction temperatures in different conditions led to lower ds and incomplete substitution. However, regioselective silylation of N-phthaloylchitosan was realized with ds up to 0.92 at room temperature. Silylated derivatives were characterized by elemental analysis, IR, and CP/MAS 13C NMR spectroscopies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomacromoleculesSame topicChemical Synthesis and ReactionsFrench-language works237,207