MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W205047784 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0077-2_6

Robust ‘H∞Control, Filtering, and Guaranteed Cost Control

2002· book-chapter· en· W205047784 on OpenAlexaff
El‐Kébir Boukas, Zi-Kuan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueBirkhäuser Boston eBooks · 2002
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)Robust controlComputer scienceBounded functionNorm (philosophy)Mathematical optimizationControl systemControl engineeringControl (management)MathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the previous chapter, we developed algorithms that can be used to design H∞controllers and ?H∞filters for dynamical linear systems with time delay. Since these algorithms are based on nominal systems, there is no guarantee that the robustness of system performance will be assured in the presence of uncertainties. To overcome this and avoid any trouble we may have, we should take into account system uncertainties during the analysis and the design phase. Therefore, the problems we studied in the previous chapter should be extended to cope with system uncertainties. Here we will consider norm-bounded uncertainties and deal with the robust H∞control problem and the robust H∞-filtering problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBirkhäuser Boston eBooksSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207