Une littérature en devenir : la réécriture textuelle et le dynamisme du champ littéraire. Les écrivaines québécoises au Canada anglais
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir de la théorisation de la violence symbolique d'une structuration interne du champ de la production culturelle (Bourdieu) et de la théorisation de la médiation hégémonique du patronage dans la manipulation de la survie littéraire (Lefevere), cet article analyse la réécriture de la littérature québécoise — la traduction et la critique journalistique et universitaire — au Canada anglais. Les « trois soeurs », Gabrielle Roy, Anne Hébert et Marie-Claire Biais, les plus traduites parmi les auteurs québécois, ont reçu la légitimation objective du champ littéraire canadien-anglais. Cette reconnaissance passe cependant par l'occultation de l'aspect historique de leurs oeuvres, et ce, dans le but d'y faire lire une lutte archétypale contre les contraintes de la condition humaine universelle. Réécrits pour paraître plus réalistes, leurs romans sont lus dans le champ de la production restreinte de la bourgeoisie en tant que « pseudo non-fiction ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".