MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050478122 · doi:10.7202/201447ar

Une littérature en devenir : la réécriture textuelle et le dynamisme du champ littéraire. Les écrivaines québécoises au Canada anglais

2006· article· fr· W2050478122 on OpenAlex
Barbara Godard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir de la théorisation de la violence symbolique d'une structuration interne du champ de la production culturelle (Bourdieu) et de la théorisation de la médiation hégémonique du patronage dans la manipulation de la survie littéraire (Lefevere), cet article analyse la réécriture de la littérature québécoise — la traduction et la critique journalistique et universitaire — au Canada anglais. Les « trois soeurs », Gabrielle Roy, Anne Hébert et Marie-Claire Biais, les plus traduites parmi les auteurs québécois, ont reçu la légitimation objective du champ littéraire canadien-anglais. Cette reconnaissance passe cependant par l'occultation de l'aspect historique de leurs oeuvres, et ce, dans le but d'y faire lire une lutte archétypale contre les contraintes de la condition humaine universelle. Réécrits pour paraître plus réalistes, leurs romans sont lus dans le champ de la production restreinte de la bourgeoisie en tant que « pseudo non-fiction ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it