MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050481240 · doi:10.1142/s0219891607001239

MECHANISMS FOR ERROR PROPAGATION AND CANCELLATION IN GLIMM'S SCHEME WITHOUT RAREFACTIONS

2007· article· en· W2050481240 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Laforest

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNational Science Council
KeywordsClassification of discontinuitiesConservation lawBounded functionPropagation of uncertaintyError analysisMathematicsNorm (philosophy)Applied mathematicsScalar (mathematics)Shock waveMathematical analysisAlgorithmPhysicsMechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive an a posteriori error bound for Glimm's approximate solutions to convex scalar conservation laws containing only shock waves. Using Liu's wave-tracing method, we show that the L1 norm of the error is bounded by a sum of residuals containing independent contributions from each wave in the approximate solution. We introduce a framework, similar to the method of characteristics, for the analysis of the local errors generated by wave interactions. The analysis allows for explicit cancellation among the errors created by a single wave and for error propagation along discontinuities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hyperbolic Differential EquationsSame topicNavier-Stokes equation solutionsFrench-language works237,207