Mapping of Microscopic Strain Distributions in an Alloy 600 C-Ring After Application of Hoop Stresses and Stress Corrosion Cracking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laue diffraction measurements made using polychromatic synchrotron x-radiation have revealed significant changes to the microscopic strain distributions in an Alloy 600 (UNS N06600) tube following the application of a circumferential (hoop) stress and then as a result of stress corrosion cracking (SCC). The changes in the elastic and plastic strain distributions were studied for the same area near the outer diameter of the tube prepared as a C-ring. Following the application of the circumferential stress, there was a notable loss of crystal order within the outermost 3 μm to 5 μm of the tube surface as a result of plastic processes; further into the sample the elastic strains in grain boundaries become oriented toward the direction of the impressed stress. The average intensity of oriented tensile strain is 5×10−3 within the outermost 50 μm of the C-ring. After corrosion, the elastic strain distribution in the same region becomes slightly compressive. The strains associated with a network of fine incipient cracks on the outside diameter of the C-ring were explored; elastic compressive strains were found within few micrometers from the crack center presumably as a result of crack opening, while plastic deformation was limited to the immediate crack region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".