MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2050485100 · doi:10.1118/1.4814927

SU‐E‐T‐498: Implementation of Clinical Monte Carlo Dose Calculation for CyberKnife On a Web‐Based Treatment Planning System WebTPS

2013· article· en· W2050485100 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karim Zerouali, M. Renaud, F DeBlois, Hugo Bouchard, Jean‐François Carrier

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill UniversityUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyberknifeMonte Carlo methodComputer scienceDICOMCollimatorPercentage depth dose curveRadiation treatment planningDosimetryNuclear medicineComputational scienceSimulationRadiosurgeryPhysicsRadiation therapyIonization chamberMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMedicineOpticsStatisticsRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The scope of this study is to implement an accurate Cyberknife model on a web‐based tool (WebTPS), which uses the EGSnrc Monte Carlo dose calculation engine. WebTPS will be mostly used as a reference to evaluate clinical treatment plans in highly heterogeneous phantoms. Methods: The WebTPS dose calculation module is linked to the user code DOSxyznrc. WebTPS automatically converts CyberKnife clinical plans to DOSxyznrc input files. Phantoms are created using a tissue segmentation method from HU‐ED calibrated curves and materials are assigned based on CT data and contours performed by radiation oncologists. Parallel computation is run on a high‐performance cluster (Compute Canada) to achieve reasonable simulation time. The CyberKnife model is built on the BEAMnrc system using manufacturer's specifications. Simulated and experimental data are compared to estimate the optimal electron beam parameters. The beam energy estimation is based on percent depth dose (PDD) data comparison, while the spot size is validated using output factor (OF) and off‐axis ratio (OAR) data. An egs_chamber model of a PTW60012 diode is used to simulate OF experimental measurements for different collimator sizes. Results: A preliminary linac model optimization yields a 0.5% agreement between experimental and simulation PDD data; a 0.5% or 1 mm agreement for OAR data and a 2% agreement for OF data. Full treatment plan simulations are achieved with the CyberKnife model using patient heterogeneous phantoms. Uncertainties under 1% are achieved for less than 2 hours of CPU time. Conclusion: This work aims to develop a suitable model for reference plan dose calculation. WebTPS will be used in several clinical and research applications where the CyberKnife embedded ray‐tracing algorithm show significant limitations. Further improvements are yet to be achieved to match experimental data to a level of 1%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→