MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050492749 · doi:10.3934/cpaa.2008.7.193

Existence of unstable standing waves for the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation

2008· article· en· W2050492749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications on Pure &amp Applied Analysis · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStanding wavePhysicsNonlinear Schrödinger equationNonlinear systemHomogeneousMathematical physicsSchrödinger equationInstabilityMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We establish a sharp instability theorem for the standing-wave solutions of the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation <p align="center"> $i u_t + \Delta u + V(\epsilon x ) |u|^{p-1} u = 0, \quad x \in \mathbf R^n$ <p align="left" class="times"> with the critical power $ p = 1 + 4/n, n \ge 2, $ under certain conditions on the inhomogeneous term $ V $ with a small $ \epsilon > 0. $ We also demonstrate that these localized standing-waves converge to standing waves of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with the homogeneous nonlinearity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it