Calreticulin Differentially Modulates Calcium Uptake and Release in the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Mitochondria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To study the role of calreticulin in Ca(2+) homeostasis and apoptosis, we generated cells inducible for full-length or truncated calreticulin and measured Ca(2+) signals within the cytosol, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and mitochondria with "cameleon" indicators. Induction of calreticulin increased the free Ca(2+) concentration within the ER lumen, [Ca(2+)](ER), from 306 +/- 31 to 595 +/- 53 microm, and doubled the rate of ER refilling. [Ca(2+)](ER) remained elevated in the presence of thapsigargin, an inhibitor of SERCA-type Ca(2+) ATPases. Under these conditions, store-operated Ca(2+) influx appeared inhibited but could be reactivated by decreasing [Ca(2+)](ER) with the low affinity Ca(2+) chelator N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine. In contrast, [Ca(2+)](ER) decreased much faster during stimulation with carbachol. The larger ER release was associated with a larger cytosolic Ca(2+) response and, surprisingly, with a shorter mitochondrial Ca(2+) response. The reduced mitochondrial signal was not associated with visible morphological alterations of mitochondria or with disruption of the contacts between mitochondria and the ER but correlated with a reduced mitochondrial membrane potential. Altered ER and mitochondrial Ca(2+) responses were also observed in cells expressing an N-truncated calreticulin but not in cells overexpressing calnexin, a P-domain containing chaperone, indicating that the effects were mediated by the unique C-domain of calreticulin. In conclusion, calreticulin overexpression increases Ca(2+) fluxes across the ER but decreases mitochondrial Ca(2+) and membrane potential. The increased Ca(2+) turnover between the two organelles might damage mitochondria, accounting for the increased susceptibility of cells expressing high levels of calreticulin to apoptotic stimuli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".