MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050518192 · doi:10.1016/j.jlumin.2009.05.022

Kinetics of the excitonic radiative recombination in WS2:Br2 and MoS2:Cl2 layered crystals

2009· article· en· W2050518192 on OpenAlexaff
Andrei Colev, C. Gherman, V. Yu. Mirovitskii, L. Kulyuk, Emeri Fortin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Luminescence · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuminescenceExcitonQuenching (fluorescence)Kinetic energyKineticsMoleculeRadiative transferTrappingPhotoluminescenceSpontaneous emissionChemistryHalogenRecombinationChemical physicsMaterials scienceMolecular physicsCondensed matter physicsFluorescenceOptoelectronicsPhysicsOpticsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to their layered structure, 2H layered transition metal dichalcogenide indirect bandgap compounds MoS2, WS2 can be intercalated with foreign atoms and molecules. The 2H-MoS2, 2H-WS2 and 2H-WSe2 crystals intercalated with halogen molecules at low temperatures exhibit a strong luminescence due to the bound excitons recombination. In this work, the results of comparative study of the excitonic luminescence kinetics for 2H-WS2:Br2 and 2H-MoS2:Cl2 single crystals are presented. A simple kinetic model describing the temperature dependencies of the steady-state luminescence intensity and of the radiative decay time is proposed. The lifetimes of the excitonic levels and the activation energy of the excitonic luminescence quenching caused by an extrinsic self-trapping process for both studied compounds were determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of LuminescenceSame topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207