MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050518192 · doi:10.1016/j.jlumin.2009.05.022

Kinetics of the excitonic radiative recombination in WS2:Br2 and MoS2:Cl2 layered crystals

2009· article· en· W2050518192 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Luminescence · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuminescenceExcitonQuenching (fluorescence)Kinetic energyKineticsMoleculeRadiative transferTrappingPhotoluminescenceSpontaneous emissionChemistryHalogenRecombinationChemical physicsMaterials scienceMolecular physicsCondensed matter physicsFluorescenceOptoelectronicsPhysicsOpticsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to their layered structure, 2H layered transition metal dichalcogenide indirect bandgap compounds MoS2, WS2 can be intercalated with foreign atoms and molecules. The 2H-MoS2, 2H-WS2 and 2H-WSe2 crystals intercalated with halogen molecules at low temperatures exhibit a strong luminescence due to the bound excitons recombination. In this work, the results of comparative study of the excitonic luminescence kinetics for 2H-WS2:Br2 and 2H-MoS2:Cl2 single crystals are presented. A simple kinetic model describing the temperature dependencies of the steady-state luminescence intensity and of the radiative decay time is proposed. The lifetimes of the excitonic levels and the activation energy of the excitonic luminescence quenching caused by an extrinsic self-trapping process for both studied compounds were determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it