MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050520617 · doi:10.2298/fuee1103385n

A shared-cube approach to ESOP-based synthesis of reversible logic

2011· article· en· W2050520617 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFacta universitatis - series Electronics and Energetics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsToffoli gateReversible computingComputer scienceLogic gateCube (algebra)Function (biology)QuantumLogic synthesisGate countQuantum logicQuantum computerTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmQuantum gateMathematicsEmbedded systemPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reversible logic is being suggested as a possibility for overcoming potential power loss and heat dissipation problems that the computing industry may soon be at a loss to overcome. However, for reversible logic to be a solution we must have techniques for synthesizing function descriptions to reversible circuits. This paper presents an improved ESOP-based reversible logic synthesis approach which leverages situations where cubes are shared by multiple outputs and ensures that the implementation of each cube requires just one Toffoli gate. It has the potential to minimize both gate count and quantum cost, and in fact our experimental results show that this technique can reduce the quantum cost up to 75% compared to results from the existing work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it