Bibliographic record
Abstract
South African youth are growing up in a society which is markedly different from that of their elders. The transition to democracy in 1994 has brought with it exciting opportunities and challenges, but youth unemployment has also rocketed during the 1990s. A lot of research and policy work has focused on how to improve the South African education system. The role of the learners in this process has thus far not been scrutinised. This paper examines young people’s educational choices, using South Africa’s Time Use Survey, a nationally representative survey conducted in 2000.We show that attendance is far from universal, even in the age ranges where attendance is supposed to be compulsory. It seems that it is particularly poor in the farming areas. In addition, we suggest that punctuality seems to be an issue.Furthermore we show that around thirty percent of learners seem to arrive at school without having eaten breakfast. This pattern may be related both to poverty and to dieting among teenage girls. Differences between girls and boys show up in other areas also. Girls are expected to perform more chores than boys and as a consequence spend less time in leisure pursuits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".