L’intégration d’un document historique à un récit de fiction : l’exemple d’Au cap Blomidon de Lionel Groulx
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Au cap Blomidon, second roman de Lionel Groulx paru en 1932, n'a pas été jusqu'ici l'objet d'un grand intérêt de la part des historiens de la littérature. Quand on en parle, c'est le plus souvent pour lui reprocher la trop grande place qu'y occuperait la narration défaits historiques. Dans cet article, nous nous intéresserons à ce défaut de 'fabrication" de l'oeuvre. Nous nous pencherons en effet sur la documentation de nature historique sur l'Acadie utilisée par l'écrivain au moment de la rédaction de son roman et sur les transformations qu'il lui fait subir en l'intégrant à celui-ci. En particulier, nous entendons mettre en lumière le rôle joué, dans la genèse et la construction ¿/'Au cap Blomidon, par La Tragédie d'un peuple, oeuvre maîtresse de l'historien français Emile Lauvrière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".