MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050573725 · doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000000286

Effects of Age‐Related Macular Degeneration and Ambient Light on Curb Negotiation

2014· article· en· W2050573725 on OpenAlexaff
M. Scott Alexander, Kim Lajoie, David R. Neima, Robert A. Strath, Stephen N. Robinovitch, Daniel S. Marigold

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsBoucher Institute of Naturopathic MedicineRoyal Columbian HospitalSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacular degenerationContrast (vision)Descent (aeronautics)Physical medicine and rehabilitationGaitVisual acuityAudiologyMedicinePsychologyComputer scienceOphthalmologyArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine how age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and changes in ambient light affect the ability to negotiate a curb while walking. METHODS: Ten older adults with AMD and 11 normal-sighted control subjects performed a curb negotiation task under normal light (∼600 lux), dim light (∼0.7 lux), and following a sudden reduction (∼600 to 0.7 lux) of light. In this task, subjects walked and stepped up or down a simulated sidewalk curb. Movement kinematics and ground reaction forces were measured during curb ascent and descent. Habitual visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and visual fields were also assessed. RESULTS: Apart from slower gait speed in those with AMD, there were no differences between groups during curb ascent for any other measure. During curb descent, older adults with AMD frequently used shuffling steps in the approach phase to locate the curb edge and showed prolonged double support duration stepping over the curb compared with control subjects. However, reduced lighting, particularly a sudden reduction, led to several significant changes in movement characteristics in both groups. For instance, toe clearance stepping up the curb was greater, and landing force stepping down was reduced. In addition, slower gait speed and greater double support duration were evident in curb ascent and descent. In AMD subjects, contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and visual field threshold were associated with several kinematic measures in the three light conditions during curb negotiation. CONCLUSIONS: Minor AMD-specific changes in movement are seen during curb negotiation. However, attenuated lighting greatly impacts curb ascent and descent, regardless of eye disease, which manifests as a cautious walking strategy and may increase the risk of falling. Environmental enhancements that reduce the deleterious effects of poor lighting are required to improve mobility and quality of life of older adults, particularly those with AMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptometry and Vision ScienceSame topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesFrench-language works237,207