Immiscible polymers in double spin‐coated electroluminescent devices containing phenyl‐substituted tris(8‐hydroxyquinoline)aluminum derivatives soluble in a host polymer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Three new phenyl‐substituted tris(8‐hydroxyquinoline)aluminum (AlQ3) derivatives have been synthesized: tris(5‐phenyl‐8‐quinolinolate‐N1,O8)aluminum, tris(5,7‐diphenyl‐8‐quinolinolate‐N1,O8)aluminum, and tris[5,7‐bis(p‐fluorophenyl)‐8‐quinolinolate‐N1,O8]aluminum. These AlQ3 derivatives are easily soluble in common organic solvents and form solid‐phase solutions in a poly(aryl ether ketone) host polymer (A435). These interesting properties allow the use of soluble AlQ3 derivatives in double spin‐coated organic light‐emitting devices of the type ITO/NPB‐QP/A435 + 50 wt % soluble AlQ3 derivative/Mg, where NPB‐QP is a hole‐transporting polymer insoluble in toluene, the solvent for A435. Typical double spin‐coated organic layer devices are characterized by an emission at 530–539 nm, a threshold voltage of 6–9 V, and a maximum luminance of 1800–4000 cd/m2 at 21–25 V. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 3006–3016, 2003
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".