MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantification of plasma lipids and apolipoproteins by use of proton NMR spectroscopy, multivariate and neural network analysis

2000· article· en· W2050599648 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNMR in Biomedicine · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopySpectroscopyMultivariate analysisProtonChemistryPlasmaNuclear magnetic resonanceInternal medicineComputer sciencePhysicsStereochemistryMedicineMachine learningNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New approaches for quantification of human blood plasma lipids and apolipoproteins are presented. One method is based on multivariate analysis of proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of human blood plasma. Although similar approaches have been developed previously, this is the first time principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares regression (PLS) have been applied to this particular task. Further, a large proportion of the subjects in this study were cancer patients undergoing treatment, which introduced a new dimension to the quantification of lipoprotein distributions. Calibration models for prediction of lipids and apolipoproteins were constructed by use of PLS, and blind samples were used to test the predictive ability. Comparison of the predicted vs observed data obtained by standard clinical chemical procedures gave good agreement; the correlation coefficient for total plasma triglyceride was 0.99, for total plasma cholesterol 0.98, for LDL cholesterol 0.97, and for HDL cholesterol 0.88. These results are comparable with those obtained with other methods. The quantitative analysis of 14 components (including total cholesterol and total triglyceride) of human blood plasma was also undertaken using various neural network (NN) analyses of selected portions of the spectra. Conventional fully connected backpropagation neural network topologies were capable of providing excellent predictions for the majority of the variables, confirming and reinforcing literature related to this approach. However HDL triglycerides were poorly predicted, while intermediate-quality results were obtained for the LDL cholesterol, plasma apoA1 and LDL apoB variables. In these instances, applying significantly different neural network algorithms involving either general regression or polynomial neural networks in combination with genetic adaptive components for parameter optimisation made improved predictions. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Abbreviations used: ApoA1 apolipoprotein A1 ApoB apolipoprotein B FID free induction decay GMDH group method of data handling GRNN general regression neural network HDL high density lipoprotein IDL intermediate density lipoprotein LDL low density lipoprotein NN neural network PCA principal component analysis PLS partial least squares RBF radial basis function VLDL very low density lipoprotein

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it