MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050620674 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m408923200

Identification of the Type I Collagen-binding Domain of Bone Sialoprotein and Characterization of the Mechanism of Interaction

2005· article· en· W2050620674 on OpenAlexaff
Coralee E. Tye, Graeme K. Hunter, Harvey A. Goldberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone sialoproteinMechanism (biology)Identification (biology)Characterization (materials science)Domain (mathematical analysis)ChemistryType I collagenBiophysicsMaterials sciencePhysicsBiologyNanotechnologyBiochemistryMathematicsEndocrinologyOsteocalcinBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone sialoprotein (BSP) is an anionic phosphorylated glycoprotein that is expressed almost exclusively in mineralized tissues and has been shown to be a potent nucleator of hydroxyapatite formation. The binding of BSP to collagen is thought to be important for the initiation of bone mineralization and in the adhesion of bone cells to the mineralized matrix. Using a solid phase assay, we have investigated the interaction between BSP and collagen. Initial studies showed that raising the ionic strength, decreasing the pH below 7, or introducing divalent cations diminishes but does not abolish the binding of BSP to collagen, indicating that the interaction is only partly electrostatic in nature. Both bone-extracted and recombinant (r)BSP exhibited similar binding affinities, indicating that post-translational modifications are not critical for binding. To identify the collagen-binding domain, recombinant peptides of BSP were studied. Peptide rBSP-(1-100) binds to type I collagen with an affinity similar to that of full-length rBSP, whereas peptides containing the sequences 99-201 or 200-301 do not bind. Further studies showed that rBSP-(1-75) competitively inhibits the binding of rBSP-(1-100), whereas rBSP-(21-100) inhibits binding to a lesser extent, and rBSP-(43-100) does not inhibit binding. These results suggest that the collagen-binding site of rat BSP is within the sequence 21-42, with residues N-terminal of this region likely also involved. This site was confirmed by the demonstration of collagen-binding activity of a synthetic peptide corresponding to residues 19-46. The collagen-binding domain, which is highly conserved among species, is enriched in hydrophobic residues and lacks acidic residues. We conclude that residues 19-46 of BSP represent a novel collagen-binding site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations123
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicBone and Dental Protein StudiesFrench-language works237,207