Superior Colliculi Involvement in Poststroke Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Pilot Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The neural mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect (USN) are unclear. The superior colliculi (SC) may be involved in USN expression, and the spatial summation effect (SSE), where reaction times to bilateral stimuli are faster than to unilateral, may be a behavioral index of SC function. We determined the feasibility of investigating SC contribution to poststroke USN using the SSE in 3 groups. METHODS: Seven participants with left near-extrapersonal space USN (USN+) following right hemisphere stroke, 10 without (USN-), and 10 controls were tested under binocular/monocular (right eye patched) conditions while responding to unilateral/bilateral stimuli. Control and USN- groups completed the SSE paradigm. RESULTS: Most USN+ participants were unable to initiate the SSE paradigm due to poor visual fi xation and demonstrated higher contrast sensitivity for left-sided stimuli. Controls showed an SSE (under both viewing conditions) while the USN- showed an abnormal SSE whereby reaction times to bilateral stimuli were faster than to unilateral-left but not to unilateral-right stimuli (under both binocular/monocular conditions). CONCLUSION: This study is the fi rst to investigate SC contribution in poststroke USN using the SSE; we identifi ed higher contrast sensitivity to left-sided stimuli and poor fi xation in the USN+ group. These fi ndings suggest avenues for research that may lead to novel rehabilitation interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it