MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050660557 · doi:10.1586/erm.12.124

Collective theranostics and postgenomics entrepreneurship: rethinking innovations as knowledge ecosystems built by complex collaboration

2012· editorial· en· W2050660557 on OpenAlexaff
Samer Faraj, Eugene Kolker, Lisa A. Bevilacqua, Vural Özdemir

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · 2012
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesGordon and Betty Moore Foundation
KeywordsAsk priceEntrepreneurshipEpistemologySociologyKnowledge managementPolitical scienceBusinessComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“The very way we formulate the problem is part of the problem …How you ask questions determines the answer.” [1]Slavoj ŽižekPhilosopher and critical theoristSome might think science is a romantic e...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.012
Scholarly communication0.0120.012
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0270.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Molecular DiagnosticsSame topicEthics in Clinical ResearchFrench-language works237,207