Argentine Consumers' Perceptions of the U.S. Brand Personality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This research applies the personality metaphor to examine the U.S. brand personality in Argentina. An extensive multinational exploratory study was conducted to identify the most common personality traits associated to country names. Subsequently, a descriptive study was carried out in Argentina with a sample of the general population with the following objectives in mind: (a) to develop a scale to measure the U.S. brand personality in Argentina; and (b) to determine whether this scale comprises good predictors of intentions to behave toward the United States. Results indicate that the U.S. brand personality is a multidimensional construct comprised of four main dimensions (facets): amicableness (cordiality and modesty), resourcefulness (vibrant and erudite), neuroticism (toughness and tyrannical), and spirited. An overall view indicates that Argentines' perceptions of the U.S. brand personality encompass a bipolar personality type, where mainly the facet vibrancy battles with toughness personality traits. The emergent Brand Personality Scale is a significant predictor of Argentines' behavioral intentions toward the United States.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".