MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2050669069 · doi:10.1139/v00-052

Diphenylboron complexes of the enol tautomers of arylpyruvic acids. Crystal and molecular structure of triethylammonium (2-nitrophenyl)pyruvato-diphenylboron(1-)

2000· article· en· W2050669069 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Wolfgang Kliegel, J.O. Pokriefke, Steven J. Rettig, James Trotter

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryTautomerEnolMonoclinic crystal systemHydrogen bondRing (chemistry)Ligand (biochemistry)CrystallographyCrystal structureIonStereochemistryMoleculeComputational chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synthesis has been carried out of 15 examples of anionic diphenylboron complexes of arylpyruvic acids, and the structures of the compounds have been determined from spectroscopic data and from X-ray analysis of one of the compounds. Crystals of5j are monoclinic, P21/n,a = 9.5566(10), b = 15.961(3), c = 16.6382(6) Å, beta = 99.3239(10)°, and Z = 4, at 180 K. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares procedures to R(F2) = 0.056 for 6662 CCD data. 5j contains a triethylammonium cation and an anion containing a planar five-membered OBOCC ring, with cation and anion linked by an N-H···O hydrogen bond. Spectroscopic data and bond distances establish that the pyruvate ligand is the enol-tautomeric state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Chemistry→Same topicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistry→French-language works237,207→