MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050683714 · doi:10.1260/1351-010x.17.1.15

Flanking Transmission Measurements: Part 1- Measurement Techniques

2010· article· en· W2050683714 on OpenAlex
Grant Emms, Tony Walther

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding Acoustics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsFlanking maneuverMeasure (data warehouse)AcousticsSound transmission classComputer scienceElectromagnetic shieldingTransmission (telecommunications)Series (stratigraphy)TelecommunicationsPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringStructural engineeringGeologyData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently a series of building acoustics measurements were performed at the BRANZ site in Judgeford, New Zealand. A special four-room test facility was built to enable a lightweight horizontal-cruciform building section to be tested. Shielding methods were used to measure the sound transmission through the various possible paths, direct and flanking for both airborne and impact sound. The results were also recombined to estimate the results for flanking configurations other than those tested. This paper presents the test facility, discusses the measurement techniques and presents some results which illustrated the measurement technique. A subsequent paper (part 2) will summarise the complete results of the test series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it