MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050690789 · doi:10.1115/1.4023805

Nonlinear Dynamic Behavior of a Flexible Shaft Supported by Smart Hydrostatic Squeeze Film Dampers

2013· article· en· W2050690789 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Bouzidane, Marc Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Tribology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrorheological fluidDamperHydrostatic equilibriumNonlinear systemVibrationSmart materialViscosityMagnetorheological fluidMaterials scienceElectric fieldForce dynamicsStructural engineeringMechanicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringComposite materialPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this research is to study the nonlinear dynamic behavior of a flexible shaft supported by smart hydrostatic squeeze film dampers, which are filled with a negative electrorheological fluid (NERF). A nonlinear model of the hydrostatic squeeze film damper has been developed in order to study the effect of the electrorheological fluid on the dynamic behavior of a flexible shaft. The results obtained are discussed and compared with the linear model, which is restricted to only small vibrations around the equilibrium position. A new smart hydrostatic squeeze film damper is proposed to reduce the transient response of the shaft and transmitted forces by applying an electric field to the NER fluid, which results in modifying its viscosity. The results show that it is possible to effectively monitor the electric field and the viscosity of the fluid inside the hydrostatic squeeze film dampers (HSFD) for a better control of flexible shaft vibration and bearing transmitted forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of TribologySame topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207