Estrogen replacement stimulates fatty acid oxidation and impairs post-ischemic recovery of hearts from ovariectomized female rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Women less than 50 years of age, the majority of whom are likely premenopausal and exposed to estrogen, are at greater risk of a poor short-term recovery after myocardial ischemia than men and older women. Since estrogen enhances non-cardiac lipid utilization and increased lipid utilization is associated with poor post-ischemic heart function, we determined the effect of estrogen replacement on post-ischemic myocardial function and fatty acid oxidation. Female Sprague-Dawley rats, either intact (n = 15) or ovariectomized and treated with 17beta-estradiol (0.1 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1), s.c., n = 14) or corn oil vehicle (n = 16) for 5 weeks, were compared. Function and fatty acid oxidation of isolated working hearts perfused with 1.2 mM [9,10-3H]palmitate, 5.5 mM glucose, 0.5 mM lactate, and 100 mU/L insulin were measured before and after global no-flow ischemia. Only 36% of hearts from estrogen-treated rats recovered after ischemia compared with 56% from vehicle-treated rats (p > 0.05, not significant), while 93% of hearts from intact rats recovered (p < 0.05). Relative to pre-ischemic values, post-ischemic function of estrogen-treated hearts (26.3 +/- 10.1%) was significantly lower than vehicle-treated hearts (53.4 +/- 11.8%, p < 0.05) and hearts from intact rats (81.9 +/- 7.0%, p < 0.05). Following ischemia, fatty acid oxidation was greater in estrogen-treated hearts than in the other groups. Thus, estrogen replacement stimulates fatty acid oxidation and impairs post-ischemic recovery of isolated working hearts from ovariectomized female rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".