A Drainage Column Test for Determining Unsaturated Properties of Coarse Materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A column test was developed to define the water retention curve and the unsaturated permeability function of coarse materials during drainage. The test includes five steps. First, the material is placed in the column at a constant density, using vacuum and deaired water to reach close to 100 % saturation, which is checked using a mass and volume method. Second, the saturated hydraulic conductivity is determined by a constant head test. Third, a gravity drainage test is performed and the volume of drained water is monitored versus time. Fourth, after full drainage, which can take several weeks, the material is removed from the top of the column, to determine the water content versus elevation and thus the water retention curve. Fifth, the water retention data and selected models are used to predict the drainage flow rate and compare the predictions to the experimental data. This helps to define the best hydraulic functions for the material. Examples are provided to illustrate the key elements of the test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it