Influence of host distribution on foraging behaviour in the hyperparasitoid wasp, <i>Dendrocerus carpenteri</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The foraging behaviour of Dendrocerus carpenteri Curtis (Hymenoptera: Megaspilidae), an ectophagous hyperparasitoid of aphidiine wasps inside mummified aphids, was examined in the laboratory with an experimental system consisting of broad bean, Vicia faba L, the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, and a primary parasitoid, Ephedrus californicus Baker. Pea aphids parasitised by E. californicus often disperse from their feeding sites (or off host plants) before dying and mummifying. Response of female hyperparasitoids to host distribution was evaluated at two spatial scales. At the first scale, behaviour of hyperparasitoids was examined on individual plants with different densities of hosts. At the second scale, habitat complexity and host location were manipulated in large foraging cages containing several plants. I show that patterns of density‐dependent hyperparasitism can result from the foraging behaviour of D. carpenteri . However, dispersal of parasitised aphids may not reduce the incidence of hyperparasitism if hyperparasitoids systematically search the habitat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".