Le statut particulier des unités de négociation dans la fonction publique du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La caractéristique fondamentale du régime de relations de travail dans la Fonction publique québécoise c'est qu'il relève du Droit commun du travail tel que complété ou modifié par la loi de la Fonction publique de 1965. Le fonctionnaire est donc en principe un salarié et Sa Majesté un employeur au sens du Code du travail sauf dérogation explicite1. Or ces dispositions dérogatoires sont suffisamment cohérentes, croyons-nous, pour que l'on puisse parler d’un statut particulier, fait de particularités fondées sur des exigences propres au service public. Ces particularités sont relatives au droit d'association, à l’accréditation, à la structure et au contenu des unités de négociation, à la délimitation de la matière négociable et l’exercice du droit de grève. A l’aide de la jurisprudence nous tenterons d'analyser ici la particularité relative aux unités de négociation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".