MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2050721756 · doi:10.1117/12.684880

Hybrid neural networks and genetic algorithms for identification of complex Bragg gratings

2006· article· en· W2050721756 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Rostami, A. Yazdanpanah-Goharrizi, A. Yazdanpanah-Goharrizi, Farrokh Janabi‐Sharifi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApodizationComputer scienceArtificial neural networkIdentification (biology)Inverse problemGenetic algorithmAlgorithmInverseOpticsArtificial intelligencePhysicsMathematicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper a novel method for investigation of inverse scattering in optical complex mediums is proposed. The proposed method is based on Radial Basis Function Neural Networks (RBFNN) and Genetic Algorithms (GAs). Medium discrimination is performed by RBFNN and corresponding medium parameters identification is done using GAs. In the proposed method for simplicity the apodized, chirped and simultaneously apodized and chirped types of mediums are considered as RBFNN library. The proposed method tries to open a new insight to inverse scattering in optical devices and systems identification. The simulated results closely follow full numerical simulations to illustrate the ability of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE→Same topicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors→French-language works237,207→