MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Role of DNA mismatch repair genetic polymorphisms in the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

2003· article· en· W2050746746 on OpenAlexaffabout
Géraldine Mathonnet, Maja Krajinović, Damian Labuda, Daniel Sinnett

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMLH1BiologyGeneticsGenotypeOdds ratioDNA repairGeneCancer researchDNA mismatch repairMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer. Genetic variants in the coding regions of the mismatch repair genes MLH1 (Ile-219Val) and MSH3 (Arg-940Glu and Thr-1036Ala) could contribute to an individual's susceptibility as modifiers in leukaemogenesis. To investigate this possibility, we conducted a case-control study on 287 children with ALL and 320 healthy controls both of French-Canadian origin. MLH1 and MSH3 variants, when taken independently, seemed to play little or no role in the aetiology of childhood ALL. However, when the MLH1 genotypes were combined with genotypes previously shown to influence ALL susceptibility, we found that the MLH1 variant Val-219 further increases the risk of GSTM1 null and CYP1A1*2A genotypes [combined odds ratio (OR) = 6.0, P = 0.002] as well as that of CYP2E1*5 (OR = 15.8, P = 0.001). No association was found with MSH3 variants. This study suggests an association of leukaemogenesis in children with both xenobiotic metabolism and DNA repair, and thus points to the effect of environmental exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of HaematologySame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207