Hyperplasia of Pancreatic Beta Cells and Improved Glucose Tolerance in Mice Deficient in the FXYD2 Subunit of Na,K-ATPase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Restoration of the functional potency of pancreatic islets either through enhanced proliferation (hyperplasia) or increase in size (hypertrophy) of beta cells is a major objective for intervention in diabetes. We have obtained experimental evidence that global knock-out of a small, single-span regulatory subunit of Na,K-ATPase, FXYD2, alters glucose control. Adult Fxyd2 −/− mice showed significantly lower blood glucose levels, no signs of peripheral insulin resistance, and improved glucose tolerance compared with their littermate controls. Strikingly, there was a substantial hyperplasia in pancreatic beta cells from the Fxyd2 −/− mice compared with the wild type littermates, compatible with an observed increase in the level of circulating insulin. No changes were seen in the exocrine compartment of the pancreas, and the mice had only a mild, well-adapted renal phenotype. Morphometric analysis revealed an increase in beta cell mass in KO compared with WT mice. This appears to explain a phenotype of hyperinsulinemia. By RT-PCR, Western blot, and immunocytochemistry we showed the FXYD2b splice variant in pancreatic beta cells from wild type mice. Phosphorylation of Akt kinase was significantly higher under basal conditions in freshly isolated islets from Fxyd2 −/− mice compared with their WT littermates. Inducible expression of FXYD2 in INS 832/13 cells produced a reduction in the phosphorylation level of Akt, and phosphorylation was restored in parallel with degradation of FXYD2. Thus we suggest that in pancreatic beta cells FXYD2 plays a role in Akt signaling pathways associated with cell growth and proliferation. Background: Reduction in functional beta cells in pancreas is the major obstacle in diabetes. Results: Mice deficient in FXYD2 subunit of Na,K-ATPase possess a metabolic phenotype of low blood glucose along with hyperplastic pancreatic islets and hyperinsulinemia. Conclusion: The phenotype observed in Fxyd2 −/− mice results from an increase in beta cell mass. Significance: FXYD2 may be a novel target for development of cell-based interventions in diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".