MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050804329 · doi:10.1016/j.crma.2004.10.021

Convergence des méthodes particulaires renormalisées pour les systèmes de Friedrichs

2005· article· fr· W2050804329 on OpenAlex
N. Lanson, Jean‐Paul Vila

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Mathématique · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsConservation lawDiscretizationApplied mathematicsMathematical physicsMathematical analysisCalculus (dental)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous présentons une étude des schémas particulaires renormalisés. La renormalisation est une technique introduite afin de corriger le défaut de consistance caractéristique des méthodes particulaires de type SPH. Un schéma conservatif, le schéma faible renormalisé, est construit à partir de la formulation faible des lois de conservation générales. Nous appliquons ce schéma aux systèmes de Friedrichs. Le schéma faible renormalisé étant instable, nous procédons à l'introduction d'une viscosité numérique avant d'appliquer une discrétisation en temps de type Euler explicite, et ainsi obtenir le schéma numérique dont nous démontrons la convergence en norme <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:math> .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it