MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050809005 · doi:10.1115/omae2003-37122

Water Collection and Discharge From an Opening in Ships

2003· article· en· W2050809005 on OpenAlexaff
Ayhan Akıntu ̈rk, Sander M. C ̧alıs ̧al, E. Mete Sireli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicShip Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeckMarine engineeringHullVolume (thermodynamics)Port (circuit theory)WavelengthAcousticsAmplitudeMeasure (data warehouse)Environmental scienceMechanicsMaterials scienceOpticsEngineeringElectrical engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsComposite materialOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, experimental results on water collection and discharge from an opening on a floating body at sea are reported. The objectives of the tests were to establish relationships between the geometrical characteristics of an open deck or a damaged hull — its beam, height of the discharge gap (e.g. freeing port) — and wave parameters such as wavelength and wave height. Two separate series of experiments were designed and models constructed for water discharge and collection. A two-dimensional model for water discharge experiments was built to visualize the free surface and to measure the flow discharge from a tank. Additionally, for the study of water collection experiments, a similar plexi-glass model was constructed. This model was used to measure time dependent volume of water accumulation on deck. The amount of water collected inside the plexi-glass tank was measured by four load-cells, at different tank opening heights and wave frequencies and amplitudes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicShip Hydrodynamics and ManeuverabilityFrench-language works237,207