Quantification of Pollutant Lead in Forest Soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fifteen podzolic forest soils in Norway covering sites with a wide range of atmospheric deposition rates were assayed for their contents of pollutant Pb. Samples from the Of, Oh, E, B, and C horizons were studied. Nitric acid soluble contents of Pb and the corresponding stable Pb isotope ratios were determined by sector field inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS). On the basis of existing knowledge on 206 Pb/ 207 Pb ratios in atmospheric deposition over Norway across time, the percentage of the Pb supplied by air pollution was calculated for the various samples and soil horizons, assuming that the C horizon was undisturbed. More than 90% of O horizon Pb was from pollution, even at remote sites in the far north. Significant fractions of Pb were pollution‐derived also in the E and B horizons at most sites. In the south, more than half of the Pb derived from air pollution has now moved to the upper mineral horizons. Stable Pb isotope ratios are a very precise tool for revealing Pb pollution in terrestrial ecosystems. The present work suggests that similar studies should be done in other parts of the world to objectively assess the anthropogenic contribution to surface soil Pb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".