MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050828688 · doi:10.1115/ipc2006-10600

Quantification of Nano-Sized Precipitates in Microalloyed Steels by Matrix Dissolution

2006· article· en· W2050828688 on OpenAlexaff
Junfang Lu, Douglas G. Ivey, H. Henein

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 3: Materials and Joining; Pipeline Automation and Measurement; Risk and Reliability, Parts A and B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMetallurgyDissolutionCarbideToughnessNano-WeldabilityMicroalloyed steelVolume fractionCharacterization (materials science)Matrix (chemical analysis)WeldingChemical engineeringComposite materialMicrostructureNanotechnologyAustenite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microalloyed steels possess good strength, toughness and excellent weldability, all of which are necessary attributes for oil and gas pipelines in northern climates. These properties are attributed in part to the presence of nano-sized Nb/Ti carbide precipitates. In order to understand the strengthening mechanisms and to optimize the strengthening effects, it is necessary to quantify the size distribution, volume fraction and chemical speciation of these precipitates. However, characterization techniques suitable for quantifying fine precipitates are limited. A matrix dissolution method has been developed to extract the nano-sized precipitates from microalloyed steels. The results from Grade 100 microalloyed steel are presented in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 3: Materials and Joining; Pipeline Automation and Measurement; Risk and Reliability, Parts A and BSame topicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of SteelsFrench-language works237,207