MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050837171 · doi:10.5539/mas.v4n10p85

Study on the Auto Air Conditioning Controller Testing System Based on Lab Windows/CVI

2010· article· en· W2050837171 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenjun Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)Air conditioningComputer scienceSoftwareInterface (matter)Process (computing)SimulationOperating systemEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the testing process of auto air conditioning controller, there are many testing channels, large numerous of data, and complex testing flow, and the research demand of the air condition controller testing system based on the virtual instrument (VI) is proposed in this article. The design methods including the hardware design, the software design, and the human-computer interface design about the air conditioning controller testing system based on the virtual instrument are introduced, and the testing result of the system is provided in this article. By the testing system based on the virtual instrument, many functions such as the parameter testing, the data storage, the real-time data processing, the curve display, and the control logics analysis of the auto air conditioning controller could be realized. This system has many advantages such as intuitive display, quick reaction, high cost performance, and complete data storage, with stronger engineering application values. This system has been used in the production line of certain auto air conditioning controller, with good effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207