MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050852384 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.094415

Incommensurability effects in odd length<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>quantum spin chains: On-site magnetization and entanglement

2013· article· lv· W2050852384 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Deschner, Erik S. Sørensen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2013
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround statePhysicsAntiferromagnetismPosition and momentum spaceBipartite graphMathematical physicsCrystallographyQuantum mechanicsCombinatoricsMathematicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the antiferromagnetic ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ quantum spin chain with an even number of sites, the point ${J}_{2}^{d}={J}_{1}/2$ is a disorder point. It marks the onset of incommensurate real space correlations for ${J}_{2}>{J}_{2}^{d}$. At a distinct larger value of ${J}_{2}^{L}=0.520\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}36(6){J}_{1}$, the Lifshitz point, the peak in the static structure factor begins to move away from $k=\ensuremath{\pi}$. Here, we focus on chains with an odd number of sites. In this case, the disorder point is also at ${J}_{2}^{d}={J}_{1}/2$ but the behavior close to the Lifshitz point, ${J}_{2}^{L}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.538{J}_{1}$, is quite different: starting at ${J}_{2}^{L}$, the ground state goes through a sequence of level crossings as its momentum changes away from $k=\ensuremath{\pi}/2$. An even length chain, on the other hand, is gapped for any ${J}_{2}>0.24{J}_{1}$ and has the ground-state momentum $k=0$. This gradual change in the ground-state wave function for chains with an odd number of sites is reflected in a dramatic manner directly in the ground-state on-site magnetization as well as in the bipartite von Neumann entanglement entropy. Our results are based on DMRG calculations and variational calculations performed in a restricted Hilbert space defined in the valence bond picture. In the vicinity of the point ${J}_{2}={J}_{1}/2$, we expect the variational results to be very precise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207